Skip to main content

Research Ethics Compliance Policy

1: Purpose

This policy outlines the requirement for all research conducted within the OpenSAFELY Service to comply with the research ethics requirements of NHS England. It contains the following sections for reference:

  • Purpose
  • Scope
  • Policy requirements
  • Determining whether an ethics review is required

2: Scope

The UK Policy Framework for Health and Social Care Research requires that the research sponsor has overall responsibility for the research, including it being “ethical… and remain so for the duration of the research, taking account of development while the research is ongoing”. This may require a favourable opinion from an NHS Research Ethics Committee, but where this is not expected or required, the sponsor must nevertheless still ensure that the research is ethical (for example, via a researcher’s university ethics committee). All research projects applying to use the OpenSAFELY Service are subject to this policy. 

3: Policy requirements

As a condition of access to the OpenSAFELY Service, all research projects must align with the ethical standards set by NHS England.

Researchers must:

  1. Obtain an ethics review from an institutional or organisational ethics board (for example, an NHS Research Ethics Committee, where expected or required, or otherwise typically via a researcher’s university ethics committee) before the project application can be approved by NHS England. It is not the responsibility of NHS England, or the OpenSAFELY Service, to obtain an ethics review on behalf of the Service User.
    • Applications can be submitted prior to the ethics review being completed, but will not be approved until evidence is provided.
  2. Either provide the OpenSAFELY Team with proof of this review at the point of application, or provide it directly to NHS England when requested.
  3. Operate only within permissions granted by NHS England and any constraints outlined in the ethical review.
  4. Cooperate with audits, reviews, or output checks as required.

4: Determining whether an ethics review is required

If a researcher is unsure whether or not their project proposal should be classified as research, and therefore subject to an ethics review, the Health Research Authority (HRA) provides guidance and a decision tool to help researchers assess this.

Alternatively, researchers may choose to consult a Research Ethics Committee (REC) for advice. Some institutions require that researchers consult their local REC when making this determination, and do not rely on the HRA tool – It is the researcher’s responsibility to ensure they comply with any such institutional requirements.

Researchers must specify the classification of their proposed project, together with details of how this was determined, as part of their project application. 

When reviewing a project application, if NHS England disagrees with its proposed classification, this will be communicated to the researcher. If NHS England considers that the project should be classified as research, and it has not been formally reviewed by a REC, the researcher will need to arrange and provide evidence of such a review before the application can be approved.

Last updated: 15 May 2026